To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Quite frankly, we should be asking to see their risk assessment. It would seem they haven’t considered the risk to the public at all. Any risk which could result in multiple fatalities should have been designed out. Putting a few buoys around a man made hazard isn’t the correct solution.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/construction/lwit/assets/downloads/hierarchy-risk-controls.pdf
Let us tell London Array to build a lighthouse to mark their hazard and they will quickly lay the cables in a proper manner, ie deeper, under the existing cables.
They should have at least acknowledged their error by naming the buoys ‘London Array Folly North’ etc.